State Preemption of Local Laws: Origins and Modern Trends

Intergovernmental affairs

Christopher B. Goodman, Megan E. Hatch, and Bruce D. McDonald, III (2021). “State Preemption of Local Laws: Origins and Modern Trends,” Perspectives on Public Management & Governance 4 (2): 146-158, doi: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa018


Northern Illinois University

Cleveland State University

North Carolina State University


June 2021



American cities are creatures of their states, with states both granting and limiting the power of their cities. This relationship is characterized by how cooperative or competitive states are with cities in their legislation. Despite the recent attention given to state preemption of local laws, this is not a new phenomenon. Part of the confusion surrounding preemption is that there is no shared definition or understanding of its forms. The purpose of this article is to begin to create that shared conception. In doing so, we define preemption according to its historic origins as the use of coercive methods to substitute state priorities for local policymaking. We argue modern state preemption of local laws can be divided into four phases, each with their own policies and mechanisms. We show how preemption has changed over time, shifting the functional, legal, and political relationship between states and their cities. Together, these phases help assist policymakers and administrators in understanding the nature of state preemption, and thus how to create and implement local policies in an environment where the distribution of power between governments is competitive and changing.


BibTeX citation:
  author = {Christopher B. Goodman and Megan E. Hatch and Bruce D.
    McDonald, III},
  title = {State Preemption of Local Laws: Origins and Modern Trends},
  journal = {Perspectives on Public Management \& Governance},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {146 - 158},
  date = {2021},
  url = {},
  doi = {10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa018},
  langid = {en}